Search Results (All Fields:"Environment", Date:" [2018\-01\-01T00\:00\:00Z TO 2018\-12\-31T00\:00\:00Z] ", isMemberOf:"bibliuned:Setopenaire")

Resultados de la Navegación (9)

RSS para este conjunto de resultadosRSS para este conjunto de resultados

Refinar

  Search Relevance Visitas Descargas
Chacón Beltrán, Rubén . (2018) Vocabulary learning strategies outside the classroom context: what adults learn in a technology-based learner-centred environment.  0.85 69 16
Marta-Lazo, Carmen, Frau-Meigs, Divina y Osuna-Acedo, Sara . (2018) Collaborative lifelong learning and professional transfer. Case study: ECO European Project.  0.77 570 498
Vargas, R. Pastor, Romero, Miguel, Abad, Ll Tobarra, Carrillo, J. Cano y Hernandez Berlinches, R.(2018) .Teaching cloud computing using Web of Things devices. .En: Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain. ()  0.73 40  
Santos, Hernán, Alvarellos, José E. y Rodríguez-Laguna, Javier . (2018) Entanglement detachment in fermionic systems.  0.73 42  
Lanchares Davila, Luis. (2018). Influencia de las nuevas tecnologías en el liderazgo (militar). Consideración especial para el Ejército de Tierra en el entorno operativo futuro Master Thesis, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (España). Instituto Universitario "General Gutiérrez Mellado"  0.73 718 2470
Sanz Prat, Victorino, Bergero, Federico y Urquia, Alfonso . (2018) An approach to agent-based modeling with Modelica.  0.72 51 16
Domingo, Rosario,, Agustina, Beatriz de y Marín, Marta M. . (2018) A Multi-Response Optimization of Thrust Forces, Torques, and the Power of Tapping Operations by Cooling Air in Reinforced and Unreinforced Polyamide PA66.  0.68 38 11
Morales, Mónica, Martínez Paz, Pedro, Sánchez Argüello, Paloma, Morcillo, Gloria y Martínez Guitarte José Luis . (2018) Bisphenol A (BPA) modulates the expression of endocrine and stress response genes in the freshwater snail Physa acuta.  0.64 58 13
Román-González, Marcos, Pérez-González, Juan Carlos, Moreno-León, Jesús y Robles, Gregorio . (2018) Can computational talent be detected? Predictive validity of the Computational Thinking Test.  0.64 51 45